WILMINGTON, Vermont -- It is unfortunate that, in Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Alabama., Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee do not have a ranking member matching the stature and intellect of committee chairman Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont.
TV viewers of this week's Sonia Sotomayor confirmation hearings are getting a lurid peek at Sessions and seeing him for what he is: a crabbed, right-wing Snopes who embodies what is wrong with today's rump, Southern-based Republican Party.
I first saw Sessions during the 1992 presidential campaign when I was traveling with President George H. W. Bush's re-election campaign. He was making a speech -- in Birmingham, I think it was -- and I was impressed only with his ambition.
Sessions lacks grace. He has that mean little Faulkner Yoknapatawpha County mouth, with an accompanying world outlook.
In lecturing Sotomayor constantly this week about the need for judges (he used to be one) to hew strictly to existing law, not letting their life experiences influence their decisions, Sessions typifies the desperate fear of conservatives that judges will carve out new rights for the poor and powerless, upsetting the status quo.
One of the many factors Sessions forgets or ignores is that the Supreme Court of the United States frequently is called upon to act in unsettled, gray areas of the law. It is at those times that the mettle and reasoning of a justice are tested. In situations without clear precedent, it is of course prudent to rule as narrowly as possible, shying from finding and grappling with cosmic constitutional questions that may not be fairly and maturely presented.
Even in narrow rulings, however, abstract reasoning alone may not yield a satisfactory answer in the case at hand. It is then that a lifetime of broad experience that has produced, yes, the empathy of a wise Latina -- or a wise white male, or a wise black woman -- should be called into play to help produce a result that directs the law toward equity.
Sadly, such a concept of well-rounded jurisprudence is anathema to the rigid Sessions. He is trying to nail Sotomayor into his own Procrustean bed of dead-brained, passive judicial decisionmaking. Let the world watch, and see an illustration of the kind of thinking that in apartheid South Africa was called verkrampte -- cramped, as opposed to verligte, enlightened.